This chapter discusses general practices for gawk
development.
The discussion here is mainly for developers with commit access to the
Savannah repo.
Usually, bug fixes should be made on the current “stable” branch.
Once a fix has been reviewed and approved, you can commit it and
push it yourself.
Typically, the maintainer then takes care to merge the fix to master
and from there to any other branches. However, you are welcome to
save him the time and do this yourself.
Some developers “own” certain parts of the tree, such as the pc and vms directories. They are allowed to commit changes to those directories without review by the mailing list, but changes that also touch the mainline code should be submitted for review.
Unless you can convince the maintainer (and the other developers!) otherwise,
you should always start branches for new features from master
,
and not from the current “stable” branch.
Use ‘git checkout -b feature/feature_name’ to create the initial branch. You may then elect to keep it purely local, or to push it up to Savannah for review, even if the feature is not yet totally “ready for prime time.”
During development of a new feature, you will most likely wish to keep your
feature branch up to date with respect to ongoing improvements in master
.
This is generally easy to do. There are two different mechanisms, and which
one you use depends upon the nature of your new feature branch.
You should use ‘git rebase’ to the keep the branch synchronized with the original branch from which it was forked:
$ git checkout master Move to master $ git pull Bring it up to date $ git checkout feature/python Move to your new feature branch $ git rebase master Rebase from master
The rebasing operation may require that you resolve conflicts (see Dealing With Merge Conflicts). Edit any conflicted files and resolve the problem(s). Compile and test your changes, then use ‘git add’ and ‘git commit’ to indicate resolution, and then use ‘git rebase --continue’ to continue the rebasing. Git is very good about providing short instructions on how to continue when such conflicts occur.
You must use ‘git merge’ to bring your feature branch up to date. That flow looks like this:
$ git checkout master Move to master $ git pull Bring it up to date $ git checkout feature/python Move to your new feature branch $ git merge master Merge from master
Here too, you may have to resolve any merge conflicts (see Dealing With Merge Conflicts). Once that’s done, you can push the changes up to Savannah.
When the changes on your branch are complete, usually the
maintainer merges the branch to master
. But
there’s really no magic involved, the merge is simply
done in the other direction:
$ git checkout feature/python Checkout feature branch $ git pull Bring it up to date $ git checkout master Checkout master $ git pull Bring it up to date $ git merge feature/python Merge from feature/python into master
If you’ve been keeping ‘feature/python’ in sync with
master
, then there should be no merge conflicts to
resolve, and you can push the result to Savannah:
$ git push Push up to Savannah
Since ‘feature/python’ is no longer needed, it can be gotten rid of:
$ git branch Still on master … * master $ git branch -d feature/python Delete feature branch $ git push -u origin --delete feature/python Delete on Savannah
The ‘git push’ command deletes the feature/python
branch from the Savannah repo.
Finally, you should send an email to developer’s list describing what you’ve done so that everyone else can delete their copies of the branch and do a ‘git fetch --prune’ (see Keeping Your Repo Organized).
To update the other remaining development branches
with the latest changes on master
, use the
‘helpers/update-branches.sh’ script in the repo.