<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 1.96 -->
<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays licensing non-cpleft" -->
<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
<title>Netscape and Free Software
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/netscape.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Netscape and Free Software</h2>

<div class="announcement">
<blockquote>

<p><a href="/philosophy/netscape-npl.html"> More href="/philosophy/netscape-npl.html">More recent news about Netscape</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
</div> Netscape</a></p>
<hr class="thin" />

<p>People have been writing with joy to tell us that Netscape has
announced a plan to make its browser free software, under the GNU GPL.</p>

<p>That is getting a bit ahead of events.  The announcement Netscape made
does not actually say that they will use the GNU GPL, and does not
assert that the program will
be <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> as we define
it in our community.  It's clear that Netscape will take a big step in
the direction of free software, but we don't know whether they will
get all the way there or fall substantially short.  In fact, Netscape
is still deciding what to do.</p>

<p>When they decide, two crucial questions will be whether people will be
free to distribute copies for a fee (on free software CD-ROM
collections, for example) and whether people will be free to
redistribute modified versions just like the original version.  If
either of those freedoms is lacking, the program won't be free
software.</p>

<p>If Netscape does release the Netscape browser as free software, that
will be a great day for the free software movement.  But rather than
rejoicing or criticizing now, let's see what actually happens, and
then we'll know whether to celebrate.  What we can usefully do now is
urge Netscape, calmly and politely, to make the software free, and to
copyleft it with the <a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU href="/licenses/gpl.html">GNU General Public
License</a>.</p>
</div>

</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer"> id="footer" role="contentinfo">
<div class="unprintable">

<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p>

<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
        replace it with the translation of these two:

        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
        to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
        <web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p>

        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting contributing translations of
        our web pages, see <a
        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
        README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting contributing translations
of this article.</p>
</div>

<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
     document was modified, or published.
     
     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
     
     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->

<p>Copyright © 1998, 2007, 2008, 2013 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>

<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>

<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->

<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
$Date: 2021/10/19 20:33:11 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
</body>
</html>