<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --> <!-- Parent-Version:1.771.97 --> <!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html --> <title>Violations of the GNU Licenses - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title> <style type="text/css" media="screen"><!-- .note#fsf-licensing { float: none; width: 47em; max-width: 93%; margin: 2em auto 3em; } --></style> <!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-violation.translist" --> <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --> <div class="article reduced-width"> <h2>Violations of the GNU Licenses</h2><!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" --><div class="thin"></div> <p> If you think you see a violation of the GNU <a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>, <a href="/licenses/lgpl.html">LGPL</a>, <a href="/licenses/agpl.html">AGPL</a>, or <a href="/licenses/fdl.html">FDL</a>, the first thing you should do is double-check the facts:</p> <ul> <li>Does the distribution contain a copy of the License?</li> <li>Does it clearly state which software is covered by the License? Does it say anything misleading, perhaps giving the impression that something is covered by the License when in fact it is not?</li> <li>Is source code included in the distribution?</li> <li>Is a written offer for source code included with a distribution of just binaries?</li> <li>Is the available source code complete, or is it designed for linking in othernon-freenonfree modules?</li> </ul> <p> If there seems to be a real violation, the next thing you need to do is record the details carefully:</p> <ul> <li>the precise name of the product</li> <li>the name of the person or organization distributing it</li> <li>email addresses, postal addresses and phone numbers for how to contact the distributor(s)</li> <li>the exact name of the package whose license is violated</li> <li>how the license was violated: <ul> <li>Is the copyright notice of the copyright holder included?</li> <li>Is the source code completely missing?</li> <li>Is there a written offer for source that's incomplete in some way? This could happen if it provides a contact address or network URL that's somehow incorrect.</li> <li>Is there a copy of the license included in the distribution?</li> <li>Is some of the source available, but not all? If so, what parts are missing?</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> The more of these details that you have, the easier it is for the copyright holder to pursue the matter.</p> <p> Once you have collected the details, you should send a precise report to the copyrightholderholders of the packages that are beingmisused.wrongly distributed. The GNU licenses are copyrightholder islicenses; they can be enforced by theone who is legally authorized to take actioncopyright holders of the software. In addition, we encourage the use of any legal mechanism available toenforceusers for obtaining complete and corresponding source code, as is their right, and enforcing full compliance with the GNU GPL. After all, we developed thelicense.</p>GNU GPL to make software free for all its users.</p> <p>IfThe Free Software Foundation acts on GPL violations reported on FSF-copyrighted code. Thus, <strong>if</strong> the program includes code that is copyrightholder <strong>is</strong> theFree Software Foundation, please sendtheyour report to <a href="mailto:license-violation@gnu.org"><license-violation@gnu.org></a>.It's</p> <p>It's important that we be able to write back to you to get more information about the violationorand the product.So,Thus, if you use an anonymous remailer, please provide a return path of some sort. If you'd like to encrypt your correspondence, just send a brief mail saying so, and we'll make appropriatearrangements.</p> <p> Note thatarrangements. Because theGPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses. This meansFSF endorsed <a href="https://www.fsf.org/licensing/enforcement-principles">the Principles of Community-Oriented GPL Enforcement</a>, you can rest assured thatonly the copyright holders are empoweredyour report will not lead toact against violations.punishing anyone for an innocent mistake who is willing to correct it.</p> <p> The FSFacts on all GPL violations reported on FSF copyrighted code, and we offeroffers assistance and advice to any other copyright holder who wishes to enforce GNU licenses. We dothe same.</p> <p> But, we cannotnot act on our ownifwhere we do not hold copyright.Thus, be sureWe recommend to find out who are the copyright holders of thesoftware are before reportingsoftware, and report the violation to them, even if you decide to use aviolation.</p>legal mechanism that allows you to seek compliance on your own.</p> <p> Our colleagues at the Software Freedom Conservancy do GPL enforcement for many free programs, through their own copyrights and with coalitions of copyright holders in those programs. The programs include Linux, Git, Samba, QEMU, and others. If you encounter a GPL violation on those programs, we suggest you visit <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/"> the Conservancy's copyleft compliance page</a> for the up-to-date list of programs it handles, and how to report violations.</p> <!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" --> </div> </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --> <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --> <divid="footer">id="footer" role="contentinfo"> <div class="unprintable"> <p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>. There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p> <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph, replace it with the translation of these two: We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection. Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org"> <web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p> <p>For information on coordinating andsubmittingcontributing translations of our web pages, see <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a>. --> Please see the <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for information on coordinating andsubmittingcontributing translations of this article.</p> </div> <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should be under CC BY-ND3.0 US.4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first. Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the document was modified, or published. If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too. Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system). There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --> <p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2006, 2007,2008, 2013, 20142009, 2014, 2017, 2018, 2022, 2025 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p> <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creativehref="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative CommonsAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United StatesAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p> <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --> <p class="unprintable">Updated: <!-- timestamp start --> $Date: 2025/01/13 16:02:24 $ <!-- timestamp end --> </p> </div></div></div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include --> </body> </html>