Next: The Non-Stationary Poisson Equation
Up: Coupling between Monte Carlo
Previous: The Cloud-in-a-Cell algorithm
Contents
In semiconductor devices, the potential retardation effects are completely negligible so
- We can neglect the computation of the magnetic field (at least for the majority of semiconductor devices, but certainly for the Silicon devices)
- We can adopt the stationary description of the electric potential, i.e. we select and calculate only the Poisson equation among the set of Maxwell's equations.
We, thus, report the Poisson equation
![$\displaystyle \nabla \cdot [ \epsilon ({\bf {x}}) \nabla \phi ({\bf {x}},t) ] = - q [ N_D({\bf {x}}) - N_A({\bf {x}}) - n({\bf {x}},t) + p({\bf {x}},t)]$](img128.png) |
(6.5) |
Actually, if we have a two-dimensional regular finite-difference grid,
the discretization of the Poisson will give an algebraic system to solve, which is quite complicated to solve, because the boundary conditions are difficult to implement in a generic simulator such as textbfGNU Archimedes and, furthermore, this algebraic system is consuming from the point of view of computer memory (even if we can use well-known methods applied to sparse matrices).
These reasons have influenced the author of GNU Archimedes to adopt a lightly different approach in the simulation of the electrostatic potential. (And for this, I thanks Vittorio Romano for his excellent advices).
Next: The Non-Stationary Poisson Equation
Up: Coupling between Monte Carlo
Previous: The Cloud-in-a-Cell algorithm
Contents
Didier Link
2007-05-18